<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Dnssec on emanuelduss.ch</title>
    <link>https://emanuelduss.ch/tags/dnssec/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dnssec on emanuelduss.ch</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.154.5</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emanuelduss.ch/tags/dnssec/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Some DNSSEC / NSEC Experiments Starting at the Root Zone</title>
      <link>https://emanuelduss.ch/posts/some-dnssec-nsec-experiments-starting-at-the-root-zone/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emanuelduss.ch/posts/some-dnssec-nsec-experiments-starting-at-the-root-zone/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was recently playing around with DNSSEC and figured out that the root DNS zone
&lt;code&gt;.&lt;/code&gt; uses NSEC and not NSEC3 to prove the absence of a resource record. This
looked interesting to me and triggered some ideas. So I did some experiments and
here are the results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img loading=&#34;lazy&#34; src=&#34;https://emanuelduss.ch/posts/some-dnssec-nsec-experiments-starting-at-the-root-zone/ldns-walk.png&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;TL;Dr:&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most interesting facts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The root DNS zone uses NSEC can be therefore be DNSSEC zone walked&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There are more than 1500 TLDs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;More than 90% of all TLDs haven DNSSEC configured&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The most used algorithm for signing DNS zones is RSA/SHA-256&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;53 TLDs also use NSEC and can therefore also be DNSSEC zone walked&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: The results may not be exactly accurate because it was not always verified if every query was always successful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
